Leo Prikler schreef op zo 09-05-2021 om 01:04 [+0200]: > > and insteads prefers something with basically no licenses. I meant to write
‘and instead prefers something with basically no restrictions at all’. here. > > I would find it interesting to know if some ‘legal people’ have > > worked out this situation. > Which ones? The ones who tell you "you must form a bill of materials" > or the ones who tell you "just provide the source"? :) The ones that don't simply tell ‘do this’ or ‘do that’ but explain their reasoning carefully. E.g., I recently came across <https://web.archive.org/web/20140427195428/http://rechten.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/FILES/root/Algemeen/Recht2/2007/GPLauteursrechtelijk/GPL.pdf> which I'm now reading. ‘Just provide the source’ is a bit simplistic anyways. If APP derives from GPL-LIB, then you can't release APP as $PROPIETARY even if you provide the source code of APP and GPL-LIB. Greetings, Maxime
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
