On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Would it be too complicated to include both the latest LTS kernel and > the most recently packaged kernel in the installer, and default to using > the same kernel for the installation?
I'm a bit confused about what you are suggesting? Do you mean, offering both of those versions in a menu to the user? > Of course, it bloats the installer having a second kernel on it... and > maybe the increased complexity to explain which to choose would be too > much... The installer does not "include" built packages, aside from what is used by the installer's OS.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
