Arun Isaac <arunis...@systemreboot.net> writes: > Hi André, > >> Your reply indicates that little or no effort was put into understanding >> my points. And no effort was put to indicate where did my reasoning go >> wrong. > > I, for one, did not understand how your workflow is affected by the way > EXWM is currently packaged in Guix. As far as I understand, Guix's > ~/.exwm separation is optional and you are not forced to create it. I > don't have an ~/.exwm, for example.
It's frustrating to keep repeating myself at this point, but let's do it. It is optional, indeed. Now assume that you don't have a .exwm file. Then (exwm-config-default) runs. But that's backwards, since the user might not want that piece of code to run. I have explained this from several points of view, several times. For instance, in one of the replies to Ludovic. > But, it is possible that I may have misunderstood something you > said. Perhaps, making your point more precise by providing a patch or > just a code snippet showing your modified exwm package would help. I did all of that. I sent a link with my own EXWM package definition. And I've illustrated my points with code snippets. https://git.sr.ht/~aadcg/aadcg-guix-channel/tree/master/item/packages/aadcg-emacs-xyz.scm#L150 -- André A. Gomes "Free Thought, Free World"
