Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing > it). > > I’d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying that, > unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and > GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in > the manual). Patch below. > > What do people think? Sounds good. > If maintainers and everyone agrees, I’d like to publicly email all the > authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing > terms, or whether they’d like a different free license. The script > below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup > still): > > scheme@(guile-user)> ,pp authors > $22 = ("A collective of GNU maintainers" […] > "Ricardo (rekado) Wurmus" > "Ricardo Wurmus" I agree. -- Ricardo