Hi, On Thu, 07 Jul 2022 at 17:09, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote:
> You mean hide with the ‘hidden?’ property? I do not know what I mean. ;-) The replacement could have an ’hidden?’ property or not being ’define-public’. > Good question. There’s probably little point in exposing the original > (replaced) version, so yes, hiding it makes sense I guess. Should we > just do that systematically? Well, we should follow the same strategy independently of the version bump. Systematically hide original (replaced) original version. Bah I do not know, what other think? Cheers, simon
