Demis Balbach <[email protected]> writes: > Hello, I was wondering what the "correct" way would be to get grammars > for the tree-sitter library available in Guix when using tree-sitter > with Emacs 29+. > > There is https://github.com/emacs-tree-sitter/tree-sitter-langs, but I > don't think it has been packaged in Guix yet. I started packaging the > grammar for JS/TS: > > (define-public tree-sitter-javascript > (let ((commit "7a29d06274b7cf87d643212a433d970b73969016") > (revision "0") > (version "0.20.0")) > (package > (name "tree-sitter-javascript") > (version (git-version version revision commit)) > (source > (origin > (method git-fetch) > (uri (git-reference > (url "https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-javascript") > (commit commit))) > (sha256 > (base32 "1pk6d9g6a7bzhxmwnvfiycarcgz76wq2rgfqr0xjh7y7swfw5hvw")) > (file-name (git-file-name name version)))) > (build-system gnu-build-system) > (native-inputs > (list gcc)) > (arguments > `(#:tests? > #f > #:phases > (modify-phases > %standard-phases > (delete 'configure) > (delete 'install) > (delete 'build) > (add-after 'unpack 'create-dirs > (lambda _ (mkdir "lib"))) > (add-after 'create-dirs 'compile > (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) > (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) > (gcc (string-append (assoc-ref inputs "gcc") > "/bin"))) > (copy-file "grammar.js" "src/grammar.js") > (with-directory-excursion > (string-append "./src") > (invoke (string-append gcc "/gcc") "-fPIC" "-c" > "-I." "parser.c") > (invoke (string-append gcc "/gcc") "-fPIC" "-c" > "-I." "scanner.c") > (invoke (string-append gcc "/gcc") > "-fPIC" "-shared" "parser.o" "scanner.o" "-o" > "libtree-sitter-javascript.so"))))) > (add-after 'compile 'symlink > (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) > (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) > (lib (string-append out "/lib"))) > (install-file "src/libtree-sitter-javascript.so" > lib))))))) > (home-page "https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-javascript") > (synopsis "JavaScript and JSX grammar for tree-sitter.") > (description "JavaScript and JSX grammar for tree-sitter.") > (license license:expat)))) > > But I'm not sure if packaging each grammar is the correct way. I > hesitate to continue working on this because there are not other > grammars packaged in Guix (yet). With tree-sitter being built into > Emacs 29+ I expected grammars to be packaged already (hence why I'm > asking if this approach is correct).
This seems correct to me, but you might get more informed opinions on [email protected] (CCed), since this is a packaging question. > > Thanks in advance! -- Katherine
