On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 22:37, Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote: > Except for one: Would it make sense to try to depend on wget2 instead?
I have no idea. )-: Do you mean replace all the occurrences of 'wget' by 'wget2'? Maybe only the occurrences of 'wget' by 'wget2' for the current broken packages on i686? Well, it would be better to fix 'wget'. (-: Cheers, simon
