Hi, Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, > > On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 12:14, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> Let's avoid manual gardening as much as possible! :-) >> >> I like the idea! > > I think that automatizing is not trivial. Sadly. > > There are many corner cases: > > 1. series as attachement > 2. not all the series is applied > 3. commit message had been tweaked > 4. etc. > > The potential issue is the number of false-positive; closing and the > submission is not applied. > > Maybe patchwork already running (I think) could help, trying to > regularly rebase the branch dedicated to the submission on the top of > master, then if all is fine, somehow the two heads from the master > branch and the dedicated branch should match, and it would indicate the > patches are included and it is safe to close. More or less. :-) We could use Gerrit's commit hook that adds a unique ID as a git trailer. Then it should become possible to 1. Check if all items of a series have appeared in the git history 2. If so, close the associated issue if it was still open -- Thanks, Maxim
