>sam. 14 déc. 2024 at 01:38, John Kehayias <john.kehay...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Is this something we agree on? I think being clear what Guix is (in terms of > "releases"), > and what we want it to be, is essential first. Thanks for the summary on current situation. I agree with you, and have nothing against. But I have a doubt. In "22.8.3 Version Numbers", we state that "Occasionally, we package snapshots of upstream’s version control system (VCS) instead of formal releases. This should remain exceptional, because it is up to upstream developers to clarify what the stable release is" So, what exactly is a packager of guix expected to package, from guix point of view ? -- Cayetano Santos GnuPG Key: https://meta.sr.ht/~csantosb.pgp FingerPrint: CCB8 1842 F9D7 058E CD67 377A BF5C DF4D F6BF 6682
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
