Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > > I agree that it has value; wouldn't it only be for testing website > problems (it's still a thing in 2025 to find a website feature that only > works with Chromium, in a nudge to the good old Internet Explorer > days).
My hypothetical use-case is simply to display PDF on a Chromecast. It only needs to connect to a LAN. > But I'm not sure that this value is worth the exposure of unsuspecting > user to tens of CVEs: [...] > I'd think that most users expect that security matters for web browsers > and that they are kept up to date/secure. Wouldn’t a big fat warning in the description of the package help?
