On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 05:14:54PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Congcong Kuo <congcong....@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > For path manipulating function they are not related to read/write
> > files and path is just a kind of data structure. In
> > nix/libutil/libutil.cc, paths are simply represented and processed as
> > string. I think it can be easily replaced using C++ standard library
> > without any harm.
> 
> I wouldn’t be so optimistic as ‘Path’ and string operations on file
> names are pervasive in the code base.
> 
> More generally, we could reduce the size of the code base, sure, but
> that’s not necessarily a win in terms of maintenance compared to a
> known-good read-only code base.

I'd phrase the code as known-working.  Considering how much upstream Nix
has iterated over the past ~10 years on the daemon code I'd consider it
an abandoned fork more than anything.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efr...@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to