Hi Nicolas, Ludo, On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 11:38, Nicolas Graves <ngra...@ngraves.fr> wrote:
> I can resubmit a clean 68315 with this change too if this helps. > > In the previous mail response, I made the point that 68315 is probably a > requirement for the following patch to be actually useful. >> attached is the reworked patch (only modules / no imported-modules >> addition, no standardization efforts, no default). >> >> Do two with-imported-modules build-upon each other? If I wrap a gexp in >> with-imported-modules, do that act like if we had with-imported-modules >> with the union of modules? >> >> From 9895ecb13110bcfaec189d3e029566d060d69889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> Message-ID: >> <9895ecb13110bcfaec189d3e029566d060d69889.1745622542.git.ngra...@ngraves.fr> >> From: Nicolas Graves <ngra...@ngraves.fr> >> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:13:05 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] build-system: Add modules field. [...] >> 49 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-) What’s the status? Well, the idea appears to me a good thing. How to move forward? Cheers, simon
