Hello, Andreas Enge <[email protected]> skribis:
> Am Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 09:42:07PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: >> And given that our current policy is to rebase, I would continue for the >> time being and also from time to time rebase next-master on master. > > not having heard an opposing opinion, I have taken the liberty to rebase > next-master on master; after Noé has added the branch to the QA queue, > it is now built out by the bordeaux build farm. (Currently it is only > 10 commits ahead of master.) I like linear histories as well, but rebasing makes it harder to collaborate (notably, a pull request targeting ‘next-master’ becomes off once ‘next-master’ is rebased) and it means that people cannot just run ‘guix pull --branch=next-master’ unless they ‘--allow-downgrades’, which is not a reasonable default. Since ‘next-master’ will be around for about one month IIUC, it might be best to stop rebasing it. WDYT? Ludo’.
