>ven. 19 déc. 2025 at 13:10, Simon Tournier <[email protected]> wrote:
> The output of this hackathon could be helpful in the very short term –
> some weeks at best – but not on a longer term where we’ll have again and
> again the same discussion.
This is a very good summary of my current understanding of this topic,
thanks Simon.
That being said, the check list in "22.10 Submitting Patches" in the
manual clearly states the importance of this, so it basically comes to
each contributor individual responsibility, I guess.
My personal experience on the matter comes mainly from [1] and [2]. I
suspect these are not isolated examples, so I still think that being
warned somehow about the package in an explicit way might be useful in
most cases. As a last resort, now that we have a ci bot checking
packages, maybe an output like
* Successfully built 1 package: nextpnr, 4.8 GB
would make sense.
C.
[1] https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/3427
[2] https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/4360
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
