Hi, Steve George <[email protected]> skribis:
> Widening out, what is needed for 'cuirass-bot' to become close to what QA did? Cuirass is not as good for the job as the Data Service, which is why I described it as a stopgap more than the “ultimate” solution: https://codeberg.org/guix/maintenance/pulls/28 Notably, it’s unable to provide a good comparison of the pull request branch vs. the target branch, something that QA does well. And it doesn’t run ‘guix lint’, and only compiles for x86_64-linux at the moment. There are incremental improvements that can be made (and they will be useful for other channels like Guix-Science anyway): https://codeberg.org/guix/cuirass/milestone/27316 … but I’d love to see QA integration with Codeberg! Ludo’.
