Cayetano Santos <[email protected]> writes: >> I maintain a set of container images at >> https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/guix/container but that is just one >> third-party contribution, and probably not directly suitable to bless >> as official images (but I could be wrong). > > Let me just complete by recalling the existence of a Guix Image hosted > at SourceHut, updated daily, kind of maintained by yours sincerely, > which may be used for running ci tasks [1].
Oh! Do they work on GitLab? How? Could you compare how your images differ from a guix pack guix bash-minimal coreutils-minimal net-base --save-provenance -S /bin=bin -S /share=share -f docker --image-tag=guix --max-layers=8 image? Which is basically what my 'slim' image is. > ps. Evil side, you’re covered too [2] > > [1] https://man.sr.ht/builds.sr.ht/compatibility.md#guix-system > [2] https://github.com/metacall/guix Indeed it would be nice to understand how these compare, and if there is some requirement in mine, yours or MetaCall Guix images that cannot be merged into the same image somehow. A basic sanity check would probably if they are built from purely Guix sources, right? My impression was that the MetaCall Guix images are more similar to my Debian+Guix images, or has that changed? That is, combines some other OS like Alpine or Debian with Guix installed on it. Sorry if I'm completely misrepresenting things here, please help me understand this space. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
