On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 7:33 PM Gabriel Wicki <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Greg! > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 06:08:25PM -0400, Greg Hogan wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 12:31 PM Gabriel Wicki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am not sure I understand. Could you explain what you mean by > > > high-trust, low-trust and how GCD007 would change these things? > > > > I still have not yet seen stated what issues or deficiencies this > > proposal is attempting to resolve. > The first paragraphs of the GCD attempt to answer this question. > > > We have the what but not the why. > Is this somehow unclear or do you just not agree with the general > intention of this GCD? I quote from the current version's "Goal" > section: > > GCD007 aims to update existing documentation where the project > de-facto moved on, collect the different parts of rulings and > documentation into one centralized document, generalizing phrasings in > a way that makes them endure the foreseeable future and augment the > existing rulings in places where they seem to contradict or be hard to > bring in agreement with our values of: > > - collective consent, > > - mutual empowerment and > > - (in)dependence of blind trust. > > > Please let me know how I can improve GCD007 to answer not only the what > and how, but also the why.
Where have we "de-facto" moved on from the current documentation? Why are we trying to "collect the different parts of rulings and documentation into one centralized document" where that document is not the project documentation? Where is the need for "generalizing phrasings in a way that makes them endure the foreseeable future"? Where do "existing rulings ... seem to contradict or [are] hard to bring in[to] agreement with our values"?
