"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <[email protected]> writes:

> Andreas Enge <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> If we decide that this is a problematic precedent, we shoul revert the
>> commit, and either remove the package in question as an input or rewrite
>> it from scratch.
>>
>> Andreas
>
> Even though atomspace-storage should be rewritten from scratch soon (I
> will try),

Submitted as https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/8629

Regards,
Florian

              • ... Ian Eure
              • ... Thanos Apollo
              • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
            • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... Ian Eure
              • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... Andreas Enge
              • ... pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
              • ... pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
            • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
        • Re: ... bokr
    • Re: Package ... Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: Package Updat... Ian Eure
    • Re: Package ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
      • Re: Pack... Ian Eure
        • Re: ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
          • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
          • ... Ian Eure

Reply via email to