>mar. 16 juin 2026 at 15:55, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote:
> Cayetano Santos <[email protected]> skribis: > >> My reflexion rather goes to the inefficiency of building twice the same >> pull request, once by the @guix-cuirass-bot, then when it lands on >> master, regardless of hardware considerations. That’s the way it is, >> and I’m fine with that. But given this fact, maybe decreasing the ratio >> of the individual pr directly built by CI is the way to go. > Oh, I see. > > That build results from pulls.ci are essentially thrown away was a known > limitation from the start: > > https://codeberg.org/guix/maintenance/pulls/28 > > The good news is that the upcoming Cuirass 1.4 addresses the security > issue that led me to set up pulls.ci in that way: > > https://codeberg.org/guix/cuirass/pulls/74 > > Once this is released and deployed, we can set up ci.guix to get > substitutes from pulls.ci, thereby avoiding rebuilds. Ah, this is great news ! This fixes the issue (almost) I guess. Thanks for the explanation ! C.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
