Hi Denis, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <[email protected]> skribis:
> I was asked to make mails shorter[1], so this is the most important > part of [2]. Thanks for doing that. > In the GCD 008 V2[3] we have: >> Contributions produced in whole or in part by genAI MAY be accepted >> provided the changes are not [“legally >> significant”](https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html), > > (1) This is taken outside of context[4] and it could be wrong. Taking > something out of context is a huge no-go for me. > > (2) GNU might have a policy with similar goals in a few month[5]. And > we (or binutils?) were asked to wait a few months[5]. I missed that > earlier[5]. Agreed. Nguyễn Gia Phong (@cnx) and Jason Conroy (@conroy) suggested an alternate wording for this, which I think should address this issue (towards the bottom of <https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/13>). > Personally I have very strong bias for unity as it strengthen us and > enable us to have bigger impact, lower contribution costs. Totally agree in principle. Note that this GCD was proposed before Conservancy published its recommendations (which I find really insightful, BTW), but also long after Gnulib, Binutils, and all the projects listed under “Related Work” came up with a policy. Thanks, Ludo’.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
