>>> I fully agree with this. My argument would be that if everything is >>> supposed to go through the command line, then we could work with very >>> limited types of expressions - instead of using not very expressive >>> Yaml, we could use a not very expressive subset of Scheme. >> >> Sure, if it is possible to define this subset of Scheme clearly, that >> could be perfectly acceptable. > > A very interesting subset would be records IMHO.
Yeah, definitely sounds like a promising direction to explore.
