Hi Simon,

Thanks for reaching out.

Simon Tournier <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Guix Maintainers,
>
> The context of my query is:
>
>     https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/issues/11154
>
> i.e., commit 12eb77825e.  This specific case isn’t one issue because
> it’s one line change.  And the case had been resolved in the bug
> tracker.  Still, a point remains open.
>
> The important question: What do we do with such kind of submission?

How about this simple addition [0] to our manual for the time being?  I
agree the unclear status quo appears to be causing all sorts of grief,
including the departure of long time contributors, which is a shame.
This is why I'm proposing this minimal, hopefully non-controversial
stop-gap solution with my co-maintainer's hat on.

If someone is so inclined (to be clear: that won't be me), we could try
fleshing it out again in a new GCD, but this simple change at least
addresses the core thing from my perspective: safeguarding the clear
license standing of the project.

[0]  https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/11407

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to