Hello!

I am confused why we still use and recommend the nix-base32 scheme for
source hashes and store paths.  As far as I can tell, it's a completely
unique algorithm that has no related RFC or documentation.  It works
fine it seems, it is a matter of professionalism. I believe the encoding
scheme should be fully described and published, with multiple
implementations, and there are of course dozens of alphabets and
algorithms to choose from that meet this criteria, some of which are
already implemented by Guix.

Is this a known concern?

--
Best,

Amy



Reply via email to