Esta nota est� de imprimirla y enmarcarla:
http://lwn.net/2000/0316/backpage.phtml#backpage
This is possibly an abuse of statistics...no, wait, I take that back.
This is _definitely_ an abuse of statistics. But it's interesting to
think about this nonetheless, especially in light of FUD-generators who
like to point out that Linux is "unstable", meaning that it changes often,
as if that were something undesirable. The obvious question to ask
a FUD-generator is "how stable does software have to be, before it
becomes good?" The following may be an answer, and I think it'll catch
a lot of FUD-generators off guard...
[...]
Y por supuesto, esto est� apenas para camiseta:
"Debian: the most unstable software of all time."
Ta-t�.
M.
--
�Desea desuscribirse? Escriba a [EMAIL PROTECTED] con
el tema "unsubscribe".
