Continuing this in public... Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/02/2003 02:01:11 PM:
> Can we continue this discussion in public? I don't see anything > sensitive here. Others can learn. [snip] > Re Gump: I marked a number of repositories as containing only > redistributable items: > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-gump/repository/jakarta.xml? > rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup Yep, but various licenses require the copyright/license to be distributed along with the code, e.g. xmlunit requires this: " * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution." It's on sourceforge and there appears to be no way to specify that if the product is redistributable that the license is on file/copied across. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > > On another note, I've noticed commits to gump to add a redistribute flag > > to it, but no commits of the various licenses of those marked as > > redistributable, e.g. jakarta jars. What is the requirement here? Maybe > > I'm missing something. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
