Adam Jack wrote:
> Note: I use telnet and not the GUI & feel that is a valid use case & plan
to
> continue that way. I hope this helps you w/ command line debugging.
It is a valid use case. Not one currently supported, but a valid use case.
Silly me, I guess I made some wacky assumption that Python Gump might
resemble current Gump. ;-)
The command line usage, with HTML (or similar) output, for running from
cron, is the only use case I care about. Surely, it is the only mandatory
use case to support, no? Gump automates builds, that is it's value. A GUI on
that is fine, but not to replace the automation, no?
I understand busy, but I can't tell if this posting is flippant, or flipping
off. Am I too far off base with this?
regards,
Adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
