On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 04:23 am, Adam Jack wrote:
> I am a pretty heavily invested user, right now, and hope to become even
> more so. I'd happily contribute more than I do.

good :)

>  I've considered working on
> supplying gump patches in order to work toward contributor status one day,
> but I feel that gump is in limbo between existing and Python
> implementations. I am not sure which to invest in. Same with documentation
> changes. A decision on the future of Gump would certainly help me...

I dont know about anyone else but I suspect the python version is the "right" 
thing to do but AFAIK all of the existing gump builds still use the java 
version. The first step to transferring to python-gump would be to get 
current gump builds done with that though I haven't looked at it so not sure 
how feasible this is.

> Could somebody point me to the right place?

Just send it here. If no one picks up on it then resend it with a more 
prominent subject :)

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
*------------------------------------------------------*
| "Religion is what the common people see as true, the |
| wise people see as false, and the rulers see as      |
| useful" --Seneca                                     |
*------------------------------------------------------*



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to