Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 24/07/2003 10.58:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I mean, would it pertain to Gump to have code that does nagging that is not necessarily related to building something?
In a certain sense it already does when a build contains checkstyle reports and style violations have been detected (see the last few cactus builds, for example).
So, it could be in scope of Gump, I'm not sure. It sounds a bit like stretching Gump to do more than just building stuff.
Well, if Gump is about building stuff, it is stretching.
What made me have this thought is that Gump comes out of Alexandria with the idea of CI, Continuous Integration.
IMHO Continuous Integration is not only about building but also "nagging", but again, this is still not a decisive argument.
Haven't those "additional community services" been a goal of Forrest when it was started?
Now you get "nasty" ;-P
In reality, Forrest has shallowed the scope a bit, and that has helped us go forward. Now the goal is simply making sites.
But if we get this a bit further, even Gump should remain in scope and keep only the build stuff.
Probably the conclusion of this discussion is that "community services" is not part of Gump or Forrest or any other project, and I should probably put it somewhere else.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
