On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Adam Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think some information gump has isn't snarfable like above.
What kind of information is it that you'd need to expose? I feel more like adding additional tokens to be expanded (@@WORKSPACE@@ or whatever) that you can use or not. Passing properties to the Ant build unconditionally can result in (admittedly unlikely) name-clashes. > So, what do you think to what I am proposing given that? I'm not exactly sure what you are proposing 8-) Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
