> is there anything to prevent gump builds being set up for incubating > projects? > > (other than actually doing the work, of course ;)
If you are asking -- could incubator projects be gump'ed, then sure -- the great resources in the sky willing. ;-) If you are asking ought such young projects be gumped, I'd say -- certainly, especially if they re-use each other. (BTW: Isn't this really what commons-sandbox is?) If you are asking for a separate gump for incubator-only projects, I see no problem w/ that. I have set up standalone gumps (whittle down profiles) as have others. One could do that w/o much effort. If you are discuss this, then personally I'd be interested in seeing a "subsidary gump" (that fed of the projects in main gump, copying jars) and then built only the incubator code. Do you mind elaborating on your thoughts? regards Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
