Yes we know krysalis are failing consitently. (I guesss I am allowing myself to be asleep at the wheel).BTW: What bugs me is if product X changes it's API (or fails to run
unit tests) and hence breaks innocent product Y, then Y gets the bad
mark. If X is then stagnant/unresponsive, Y gets slammed. I don't
see a way that Gump can detect it was X that broke Y, and not Z. Now
I realize that Y will eventually move off X,
Very unlikely, even for projects that consider themselves "friends of
Gump". When has Gump tried to build Cocoon or Forrest the last time?
Are you aware that almost all krysalis-* projects fail every night
"because Centipede has not been not initialized"? 8-)
The continued gump failures are one of the reasons POI stoped using centipede.
I would say centipede is not very gump freindly right now. And people should be aware about that. More importantly krysalis needs to fix it.
R, Nick
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
