> Woah, > mkdir and delet int the Gump Descriptor. That seems wrong to me. I > thought the dump descriptor was declarative. > > Oh well if it there we should support it.
Good point. I started adding them, and then realized what you just stated. I agree they are potentially dodgy (so perhaps we ought "frown on them -- unless there is a darn good reason".) I see <deletes that say "clean up last build" -- but the "rsynch --delete" (if used) ought do that (ought it not?) Even in a workspace that works on the same directories each run (not like Sam's nightly to a dated directory) ought be "clean" because of rsynch. For <mkdir, if a users build.xml is 99% used for developers, and less often by Gump, maybe there is a need. That said, I'm not sure it couldn't transparently go into the build.xml. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind these two. Are there examples of why they are needed? BTW: I don't see <delete or <mkdir documented on the Gump pages. Are they? regards Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
