> > > Would it be possible to treat CVS errors as non-fatal? > > The "traditional" Gump should do exactly as you expect - if it has > been able to perfom a CVS checkout at least once, that is.
This thought occurred to me as (this weekend) I couldn't test crap due to cvs.SF.net dumping on junit. What I'll do is mark a warning, but continue. Better some Gumping than none when CVS/SVN updates fail. I just want reader of the Gump output to be very aware that this occurred, and the Gump is potentially on stale data. Folks like SF.net have show we can have 'extended outages' with Gump runs giving folks a false sense of security. regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
