I haven't been following the discussion but for the record I think using Gump is great and should be continued. That said, I'm no longer active on the mockobjects project so I'll let active members decide on this.
Thanks -Vincent PS: Stefan, I do really appreciate Gump and as soon as I find a few minutes I'll continue working towards helping make the cactus build work with Gumpy. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 February 2004 08:20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: mockobjects-java-dev > Subject: Re: [MO-java-dev] compilation problem for mockobjects > > On Mon, 02 Feb 2004, Nat Pryce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Who put mockobjects.com into gump? Whoever it is, they should sort > > out the problem. > > Oh my. > > Having mockobjects built by Gump used to be appreciated by Jeff and > Vincent. Given that cactus relies on mockobjects and also relies on > Gump quite a bit, this seemed natural. > > There is no problem with removing mockobjects from Gump if that is > what you want. I'll take care of it. > > Cheers > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
