On Mon, 02 Feb 2004, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to continuous integration,
I'm not sure whether this is too broad
avalon (the other TLP charter I participated in whipping up) has quite a broad resolution. "too broad" is difficult for me to assess. I'm not sure either. Gump is what it is, and will be what it will become, and that should not go beyond what is in its resolution. We need to make reasonably sure we remain to fit the resolution. That seems an argument for "broadness".
and if this collides with the goals of the Maven project.
probably. Is that bad? Maven 'collides' with some of the ant project goals, doesn't it? Is that bad?
I dislike the term "collides" tho'. Sounds negative. There's overlap. There is between most projects, primarily because the programmers don't know how to avoid it I guess.
So far Gump is tackling one facet of continuous integration which may be more than just building things against each others latest source control versions.
well, it's doing a little more than that already, innit? :P
Anyway, I'm sure we could come up with some kind of definition that's less broad (probably a longer one :D), but I don't quite understand why we actually need one. Regardless, Stefano's and Nicola's alternatives seem okay as well.
-- cheers,
- Leo Simons
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ IoC Component Glue -- http://jicarilla.org/ Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but people wouldn't obey the rules." -- Alan Bennett
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
