Re: Build of xml-batik on gump

[Antoine L�vy-Lambert]

Your message has been posted :
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jseng/2900
since I did not see it on google, I posted a similar message through 
groups.google.com.

Now I have a feeling that it might be better in the short run to build 
xml-batik with a packaged rhino,
ideally the one which is shipping with xml-batik.

I do not know *yet* how to change the project descriptors so that it 
happens.

If the rhino folks come back to us and say they have changed their head 
revision so that it builds with xml-batik, or when xml-batik will adapt 
their code,
we can change that.

Maybe we can have in parallel xml-batik-from-packaged-rhino and xml-batik.

Antoine

Adam Jack wrote:

Ah, here we go, I wonder if this is an open list, that I can just post to?

regards

Adam

 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: Build of xml-batik on gump
   

   You might try nagging rhino as it was their change that caused
the problem - if they can give us an upwards compatible solution
I'll use it (the basic issue is that they added a method to an
interface that uses a class that didn't exist in the version of rhino
we are currently using).
       

This is a valid point. I've long wished that Gump could nag the 'cause'
     

of
 

a
   

problem, not the 'effect', but it is (AFAICT) pretty much impossible to
guess who is cause from a compile failure. It is quite possible that the
Rhino folks aren't aware of the problem this has caused, and they might
     

be
 

open to re-working things.

Is there a Rhino mailing list anywhere? I don't see one here:

   http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/

regards

Adam

     



 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]