On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Elliotte Rusty Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 9:20 AM +0100 2/16/04, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >>Done using your address as the recipicient. Maybe you'd prefer >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] or even [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead? >> > > Not instead of. I don't actually subscribe or post to those mailing > lists myself. The only java.net service I use is CVS. If you can add > several nag e-mail addresses, then they could be added. Up to you.
Yes, Gump send nags to multiple lists. Which one would be most appropriate? Well, if you don't subscribe to them yourself, you probably won't know either. 8-) > Would Gump be interested in making nightly builds available? The things that Gump builds are "nightly builds" of a very special kind. The XOM builds have been compiled against CVS HEAD versions of the Servlet API for example. It is possible (unlikely, but possible) that this may break when the jar is used against an older version of the same API. > I notice you do that for some other projects. You mean <http://gump.covalent.net/jars/latest/>? The things we place there are those that have been marked redistributable in the Gump descriptor. To get this status, we (the ASF) must be able to redistribute what we are building, and this probably rules out LGPLed code - I'm not 100% sure about this. But, big but, the current location is on donated hardware using donated bandwidth dedicated to Gump and I'd be very reluctant to make this a nightly build system for any project at all. Cheers Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
