My own votes. On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can stick with CVS or switch over to SVN If we switch to svn, all committers who want to contribute to the metadata have to create SVN accounts first. So I'm leaning towards going with CVS until more CVS committers have become SVN committers as well, just to keep the entry barrier low. Re: splitting metadata from code, I think we should split them. And maybe restrict commit access to code. We need some way to identify future PMC members 8-). Access to metadat should be kept open to all ASF committers. > We should ask for a virtual host on minotaur for the site IMHO. Well, my original mail wasn#t as neutral as intended. > move [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or is there > a better name? It has been [EMAIL PROTECTED] not gump-dev. I'm totally on the fence about the name, think [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be fine. > do we want a Wiki for Gump? We haven't used the Wiki much, but I don't see any reason to not have one. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
