Hi Alberto,

Sorry, I missed your message until today.

There is a guide for gvSIG 2.0 developers [1] where you can find a section about migrating a project to gvSIG 2.0 [2].

As of now, that documentation is only available in spanish, but soon it will be translated to english. In the meantime, I hope you can use the google translation tools to be able to read it.

In any case, don't hesitate to ask any questions you may have about the migration process.

[1]: http://www.gvsig.org/web/projects/gvsig-desktop/docs/devel/gvsig-devel-guide [2]: http://www.gvsig.org/web/projects/gvsig-desktop/docs/devel/gvsig-devel-guide/2.0.0/howto-migrate-projects-to-gvsig-2-0

Regards,

--
Cèsar Ordiñana Navarro
Arquitecto Software gvSIG
DiSiD Technologies SL  http://www.disid.com



Francisco José Peñarrubia escribió:
Hi Alberto.

About porting, it depends on the extension, of course, but the answer is YES, with a bit of work. I haven't seen the code, but I suppose you will need to change things like exceptions, and the geometry model is different in 2.0, so.... migrating one extension from 1.9 to 2.0 is more work than from 1.1.2 to 1.9, for example. Also, FeatureIterators are changed, and the whole model of accesing data, among other things.

In the other hand, windows and user interface may suffer little changes.

Anyway, there are people in this list than can answer better than me about that. Maybe they can correct me if I am wrong.

About documentation, this is the only docs I know by now:

http://www.gvsig.org/web/docdev/gvsig_desktop_2_0/

but I'm pretty sure you already know.

Best regards, and good luck!!!.

Fran.

Alberto Perli escribió:
Hi Francisco, we have seen in Valencia, talking about the italian project on
extending gvSig with Z&M coordinates. Flavio's patch is developed in this project, so, talking with our team but
in particular with customers, there is the hope to see the patch in 1.9.1
release, but in 2.0 too!
In fact we are working on a new extension on 1.9 release (the extension will
be ready at the end of April), and the big question is:
The extension we are developing on 1.9, could be ported in 2.0? If not,
there will be some specification or guidelines to easily migrate the
extension from 1.9 to 2.0 model?
Thanks,
Alberto


_______________________________________________
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional


_______________________________________________
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional

Reply via email to