1. Our postgis database is using UTF-8. To better describe our problem, we have made a small experiment to serve ortophoto data using WMS and EPSG:4826. 1. The ortophoto data is a set of Capevedean National SRS geotiff files. 2. In mapserver directory (MS4W/proje/nad) we introduced, manually, in the epsg file our srs twice (codes 4826 and 32768). We have 2 corresponding mapfiles (one serving WMS in 4826 and the other in 32768). 3. In gvSiG we inserted our srs twice (codes 4826 and 32768) using the user defined srs option. 4. If we access our WMS using 32768 it works correctly, but if we use 4826 it get distorted after zooming.
Cheers, Idalina On 13/05/11 20:32, Idalina Almeida wrote: > Thanks very much for your answer. > The parameters you used are correct and the shapefile you sent worked ok. > We > have no problem using the custom 4826 in gvSIG to visualize a shapefile or > to get a shape from postgis. > Our problem is when we try using gvSIG (usr defined 4826) to connect our > WMS > (Mapserver) that serves the shape also in EPSG:4826. > At first the image looks right, but when we zoom in it get distorted. We > are > sending to screen image showing the problem. Are all datasets using the same codepage? -- Cheers Simon -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Cape-Verde-Islands-EPSG-code-in-gvSIG-tp6354751p6359338.html Sent from the gvSIG users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Gvsig_internacional mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
