El 02/08/12 11:11, Ruth Schönbuchner escribió:
Dear Cèsar, list,
regarding this issue in having effort for testing, translations,
spreading... i
want to add that José and me put a lot of effort in spreading gvSIG in
Germany!
For many years, we put our time and effort in doing presentations,
workshops on the
different conferences like AGIT, FossGIS or Intergeo.
We found a bugs that are well documented and we also work hard in
trying to fix them to improve
the software and we send the patches to you to improve gvSIG!
It would be impossible to work in real terms without local committers
(gvSIG has zero committers outside Spain).
Changing gvSIG CE to another name would complicate this exchange.
Personally I would prefer to discuss on how to improve the software
and on how to improve
contribution between gvSIG Association and non-members.
Maybe we can find a way?
Hi Ruth.
I really appreciate all the effort you have done and I know you keep
carrying on, I don't have any doubt about that.
But I don't agree with you in the need to create a separate project fork
to be able to contribute. I'm sure the process might be improved, but it
is already defined how to contribute in the project, be it with code,
documentation, translations, etc. You have all the needed documentation
in the gvsig.org website. Of course any comments about it are wellcome.
In any case, gvSIG being an open source project, anyone is free to
create a fork. I don't have any problems with that and the gvSIG CE
existence.
But this discussion is about the name, which is generating a lot of
confusion between users.
Regards.
--
Cèsar Ordiñana Navarro
gvSIG software architect
DiSiD Technologies (http://www.disid.com)
_______________________________________________
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
[email protected]
To see the archives, edit your preferences or unsubscribe from this mailing
list, please access this url:
http://listserv.gva.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gvsig_internacional
