Hi all, Here is one proposal for gvSIG CE:
There are some processing elements that are duplicated, since they appear in some gvSIG element such as the geoprocessing manager or the raster tools, but are also part of SEXTANTE. To me, it makes no sense having both of them, and all spatial analysis should be done through SEXTANTE (that gives you more options, since you can use algorithms in the modeler, the batch processing interface, etc.). What about removing them? As long as there is an alternative in SEXTANTE, I think all these elements should be removed. This has been proposed within the official gvSIG project several times, but it seems they are not working on this direction, so maybe it is something that we should do on the CE version. I would like to know your opinion about this. I will take all the work needed (implementing missing features in SEXTANTE, cleaning the gvSIG code), but I want to know that you think it is a good idea. Regards Victor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Methodology on "Lean Startup Secrets Revealed." This video shows you how to validate your ideas, optimize your ideas and identify your business strategy. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appsumosfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Gvsigce-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gvsigce-community
