No, Did I say I run all screen reader at start up?  In my previous email I
stated I did a quick install of Window eyes, when I had Jaws at the time set
to start up after log on.  I made a mistake and should have done a custom
installed and made sure that the window eyes did not load up after the
reboot.

How ever, I am just suggesting a small little check sum feature to make sure
something like what I had happen don't cause a total system reboot cycle.
For one, I'm not the only one that done this problem as I think Mich told me
when I talked to him when this happen, that other were having the same
problem.  And this might just be a Vista Related issue.  Haven't realy try
doing it in XP.

Matt. 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Gunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 2:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities

Hello:

You mentioned you have 5 screen readers, are all of them running at
startup?  Smile

I would have to agree with Steven's earlier message and in my words,
it's a user's responsibility managing what's in startup.

 


John Gunn
Computer Technician
Renaissance Learning INC.
Hours Monday-Friday 8:30-5:00
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: K. Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 2:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities

I don't blame GW.  If you read correctly, I stated I should have done a
custom install.  Either way, this is a feature that would prevent people
crashing there system and so forth.  Shouldn't take but, maybe 10 lines
of code.  

I run 5 different screen readers.  

It is either that feature, or you have it wear Window eyes don't load up
after it had detected a major error, until you resolved the issue.  You
take your pick.

I am only suggesting something simple.  I don't blame GW for causeing a
major crash issue.  If you want to get into blame game, I blame JFW for
crashing one of my servers.  Which was a Windows 2003 server.  I lost
over 2 Terabytes because of them.  And it wasn't even a beta.  I only
use GW on my server system now.  I don't even allow anybody to install
JFW products on any of my servers.  I have them blocked.

Matt.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Clower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 1:45 PM
To: gw-info-gwmicro.com
Subject: Re: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities

I still don't see how it is GW Micro's responsibility to check for other
screen readers at startup. When installing any new piece of software,
you should read through what it will do, and how it will work. If you
know a quick install will enable Window-Eyes at startup, then either
tell Window-Eyes not to do that when it reboots, or disable the
automatic startup option of your current screen reader. Failing to read
instructions to save yourself one minute of time is frankly no excuse to
blame a company if something goes wrong due to your own oversight.



K. Matthew wrote:
> One reason why I'm highly suggesting this, is the fact, I had this 
> problem happen to me, and I couldn't log into my computer.  Well I 
> called GW, and see if they might have a way to by pass this problem, 
> because when window eyes load up and another screen reader at the same

> time when I logged in,
it
> would crashed the whole computer.  This was just after installing 
> Window eyes.  Sure, I could have went and installed a custom install 
> instead of quick install and maybe be able to uncheck it from starting

> up automatically.  But, to call and get.  You going to have to 
> reinstall your windows response, was not something I wanted to here.
>
> It took me over 30 restarts to be quick enough and lucky enough to 
> stop WE from loading up and then be able to uninstall it.  Needless to

> say, I
nearly
> lost over 100 gigs of prodjects that I was currently working on.
>
> And yes I know it was a beta, but, that don't mean to tell a customer 
> oh well you got to reinstall your windows.  What if I installed it on 
> my 3 Terabyte server?  How you think I'm going to reinstall windows 
> with that much information on it?  And this is not only happen with a 
> Beta, it's
even
> happen with 6.1 as well.
>
> Matt.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: K. Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 1:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities
>
> True. Either way, having a check for screen reader before launching 
> shouldn't be too hard to have going.  If a Low tech screen reader can 
> do
it,
> why not the higher end?  I know it's different codeing, video driver 
> and
all
> that.  But, to check something so simple as another screen reader 
> product running isn't that hard to implement.  All they would have to 
> do is a code to check for a task running on the  start up code, to see

> if said name of screen reader is running.
>
> I kno WE works with  AI Square, they could exclude it from the list of
what
> is running.  
>
> I'm just saying, something as simple as this could be put into the
program,
> and it would help prevent one less issue with people crashing there 
> system on start up's or while running in windows and accidently start 
> another screen reader.
>
> They could have it were it ask you to shut down any screen reader 
> before relaunching the program, or would you like to shut down window 
> eyes to
allow
> other screen reader control.
>
> Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marvin Commerford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 1:06 PM
> To: K. Matthew
> Subject: Re: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities
>
> Hi.  Just because they do something in SA doesn't necessarily mean it
would 
> work well for all vendors.  Let's say for example that they actually 
> code
in
>
> process names of other known screen readers.  It work fine until 
> another product comes around.  You may or may not remember the article

> that was on

> their site a couple of years ago criticising the way FS and GW were 
> going about designing their products.  Basically the article stated 
> that newer technology was being used in SA than in WE or JFW.  Doug 
> actually debunked

> the article and it was quickly removed from their site.  SA is what it
is.

> They do have some fine ideas but you have to sometimes look a bit 
> deeper into what's going on.  There always will be programs that just 
> won't work with SA or NVDA and others like them because of their lack 
> of video intercept.  SA makes portability important and that's neat.  
> It is a give and take though.  I find that reading the items in My 
> Computer with SA to
be
>
> tiresome at best.  Again, they have some fine ideas and it's excellent
that 
> they're out there doing what they do.  But in the past they haven't 
> been above stretching the truth a bit.
>
>
> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original 
> sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and your 
> message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your 
> message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
>
> All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, 
> and
can be searched through and sorted using the search
> form at the bottom of the page. 
>
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body of the 
> message.
>   

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message
is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and
can be searched through and sorted using the search form at the bottom
of the page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body of the
message.


If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and
can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can
be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
of the message.


If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
of the message.

Reply via email to