Hi all,

I was hoping gw staff would respond to this:

Is it possible to get a beta 3 priorities list together?

What items should we be most focused on to have bug free / fixed?
What is the gw main focus?

I mentioned that I think the loss of speech is the biggest issue we face.
I also hoped that we could get more info to gw about these problems when they 
happen.
I asked for ideas but, just got derailed in to a script discussion that was a 
waist of time.

Maybe gw could give us a tiny single exe screen reader that would provide 
enough speech to exit we and see if there are any errors on the screen from 
windows?
Ideas guys are what we need to fix this.

Any info gw has to help with this would be great.
I would like to never lose speech again.
I realize that this is not a realistic expectation but, we should work harder 
on this.
Thanks so much.
Sam

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Sam bushman 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:31 PM
Subject: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities


Hi all,

Is it possible to get a beta 3 priorities list together?
I like it when we find bugs report them they are duplicated and fixed for the 
next version.

But, we need to start to focus on the most important issues / a priority list 
if you will.
In other words ... many of us are reporting the same things over and over.
I agree they are problems but, GW has basically said they aren't working on 
msaa stuff.
So, email, web browsers pdf files (any thing that uses msaa is not the focus).
It doesn't matter if we agree that is the proper order ... that is what is set 
for fix / release.

I personally would have rerote the msaa / browse mode stuff way before I would 
have added power point / itunes  and scripting.
But, GW has the list of what they think best and we need to trust them and be 
part of the solution for the next release ... isn't that what we agree to when 
we use / run the beta.
  
Now please don't email the list debating with the above and the pros and cons 
of this are.
I am not trying to speak for GW and am just repeating what I personally think 
they said and ment.

Personally the loss of speech is the biggest issue for me.
I lost speach yesterday ... couldn't get it back for the life of me.
I had a sighted daughter say that we was running and she clicked around and the 
computer was working perfectly.
She didn't know why the speach was not happening but, I had her click on the 
system tray icon for WE and exit the program.
It exited cleanly and I just pressed ctrl-alt-w and we came back to life.
No errors of any kind and when I tried to send an error report WE said there 
were no errors to report.
The sad part about this is I was not able to get GW any info to help resolve 
this (huge!) loss of speach issue.
Since we would like WE to be rock solid and would love to have speech as 
reliable as the screen output ... I am hoping all of us can come up with a way 
to duplicate and help GW resolve this main issue.

Any ideas on this?

If GW could give us a list of things we should try and do in order when we 
loose speech we may get them more info that would be helpful.
Currently I know that the story I just told about loss of speech above doesn't 
help them at all.
But, If I know exactly what they are looking for and what they want me to do in 
order and reported solid step by step info ... they could get to the bottom of 
this.

Any ideas are welcome.
Any one else think the loss of speech issue is bar none the biggest issue for 
us?

Thanks for listening.
Sam bushman


If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body
of the message.

Reply via email to