Hi Marvin,

You are waisting my time.
I am not going to argue with you about lists ... who has them ... how long gw 
has been in business or any thing else.

If we are beta testers and are providing feedback to GW ... it would be most 
helpful to know what they want feedback on.

Several of us spent time on providing feedback for browse mode ... only to find 
out that they already know about those problems and they aren't working on 
fixes for that right now.
They told us that they will tackel browse mode issues / rewrite that part post 
V7.0 release.
I am not complaining about that at all.
However, this is the time for us as  there most dedicated users to let them 
know what is most important to us and a way for them to let us know how we can 
be the best beta team directly helping provide feedback on the things they are 
working on.

Do you want to be part of this effort or do you want to spend your time telling 
me I don't have a clue!
Maybe the gw staff can jump in here and see what ideas are best and provide us 
the info to best use the beta sycle to get out the best we7.0 ever?
Thanks
Sam

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Marvin Commerford 
  To: Sam bushman 
  Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 9:57 AM
  Subject: Re: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities


  Hi.  Do you really think they don't already have a list?  They have a lot 
more data than anyone on the list has.  They take the support calls and 
messages that are sent directly to the support email.  Why should they 
publicize an ordered priority list?  They'd be spending a ton of time reading 
through all the second guessing messages from people who would not agree with 
their order.  They do take feedback but in the end they're the ones who have to 
allocate resources to get things done as efficiently as possible.  Any list put 
out by list members might make some people feel like they're making a 
contribution but it would probably be duplicate effort.  GW's been in business 
for over 18 years so they most likely have an idea about how to prioritize 
issues.

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Sam bushman 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 8:50 AM
    Subject: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities


    Hi all,

    I was hoping gw staff would respond to this:

    Is it possible to get a beta 3 priorities list together?

    What items should we be most focused on to have bug free / fixed?
    What is the gw main focus?

    I mentioned that I think the loss of speech is the biggest issue we face.
    I also hoped that we could get more info to gw about these problems when 
they happen.
    I asked for ideas but, just got derailed in to a script discussion that was 
a waist of time.

    Maybe gw could give us a tiny single exe screen reader that would provide 
enough speech to exit we and see if there are any errors on the screen from 
windows?
    Ideas guys are what we need to fix this.

    Any info gw has to help with this would be great.
    I would like to never lose speech again.
    I realize that this is not a realistic expectation but, we should work 
harder on this.
    Thanks so much.
    Sam

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Sam bushman 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:31 PM
    Subject: WE 7 Beta 3 issues and priorities


    Hi all,

    Is it possible to get a beta 3 priorities list together?
    I like it when we find bugs report them they are duplicated and fixed for 
the next version.

    But, we need to start to focus on the most important issues / a priority 
list if you will.
    In other words ... many of us are reporting the same things over and over.
    I agree they are problems but, GW has basically said they aren't working on 
msaa stuff.
    So, email, web browsers pdf files (any thing that uses msaa is not the 
focus).
    It doesn't matter if we agree that is the proper order ... that is what is 
set for fix / release.

    I personally would have rerote the msaa / browse mode stuff way before I 
would have added power point / itunes  and scripting.
    But, GW has the list of what they think best and we need to trust them and 
be part of the solution for the next release ... isn't that what we agree to 
when we use / run the beta.
      
    Now please don't email the list debating with the above and the pros and 
cons of this are.
    I am not trying to speak for GW and am just repeating what I personally 
think they said and ment.

    Personally the loss of speech is the biggest issue for me.
    I lost speach yesterday ... couldn't get it back for the life of me.
    I had a sighted daughter say that we was running and she clicked around and 
the computer was working perfectly.
    She didn't know why the speach was not happening but, I had her click on 
the system tray icon for WE and exit the program.
    It exited cleanly and I just pressed ctrl-alt-w and we came back to life.
    No errors of any kind and when I tried to send an error report WE said 
there were no errors to report.
    The sad part about this is I was not able to get GW any info to help 
resolve this (huge!) loss of speach issue.
    Since we would like WE to be rock solid and would love to have speech as 
reliable as the screen output ... I am hoping all of us can come up with a way 
to duplicate and help GW resolve this main issue.

    Any ideas on this?

    If GW could give us a list of things we should try and do in order when we 
loose speech we may get them more info that would be helpful.
    Currently I know that the story I just told about loss of speech above 
doesn't help them at all.
    But, If I know exactly what they are looking for and what they want me to 
do in order and reported solid step by step info ... they could get to the 
bottom of this.

    Any ideas are welcome.
    Any one else think the loss of speech issue is bar none the biggest issue 
for us?

    Thanks for listening.
    Sam bushman

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page. 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body 
of the message.


If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include leave gw-info in the body
of the message.

Reply via email to