Well, ok then, that's why I asked 'grin'.
Thanks for the explanation.
At 01:27 PM 7/31/2009, Michael D. Lawler wrote:
>Well unfortunately for you your guess is wrong. We spent about as
>much time going from XP to Vista 32-bit as we did going from Vista
>32-bit to Vista 64-bit. Going from XP to Vista 32-bit was more
>complex than you might think because of all of the new IL stuff that
>Microsoft added. Again the computer industry transitioned because
>it could and because it was simpler to only offer one OS rather than
>offering two. Just because one can do a thing doesn't mean that one
>needs or should do that thing and I still contend that for what a
>vast majority of computer users are doing 64-bit is currently a
>complete waste. We simply miscalculated when this transition was
>going to take place and didn't make 64-bit a priority until it
>started impacting the majority of our customers. For better or
>worse this is simply how we do things and some times people get left
>out not because we don't care about there needs, but because we only
>have resources to do so much and we have to make the call as to what
>gets done and what doesn't.
>
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body
of the message.
