Not supprised.

People are fooled by the specs on a netbook, they think because it says 1.8 it must be atleast somewhat fast, but it's not.

By the time you factor in the differences in instruction sets between a netbook and even a plain jane pentium 4, and the reduced bus speed, and memory bandwidth, your really running something like a 700 mhz pentium 3 machine.

Why do you think these things are so cheap?

There are also different types of computing, things that need floating point will really suck on a netbook.

So you really do get what you pay for, netbooks are for college kids writing papers, or to do light browsing and im, not for serious computing.

They also suck on most things audio, one of my students insisted on trying to run sonar 7 on a netbook, and we went through all sorts of issues before she upgraded.

Despite the improvements in efficiency ms has given w7 over the sorry vista os, it's still more of a hog than xp.

So xp will generally run better on a netbook.

I know they're making these things a bit beefyer these days, but they're still kind of like toy computers.

People like them because they're so small, but never make the mistake of thinking your going to get anything like the performance you'll get from a decent processor, even one a couple generations older.



At 09:25 AM 6/21/2010, Petty, Richard wrote:
Let me underscore one of Karen's points about Windows 7 on a Netbook. I moved to a Samsung netbook to take advantage of the better keyboard. The unit I purchased only came with Windows 7 Home. Even with 2 Gb memory installed, the Samsung has ben excessively slow with WE 7.2. I may attempt to purchase a copy of XP home and install that on the Samsung or replace the unit as soon as I can.

Richard Petty
ILRU - Independent Living Research Utilization
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Karyn Campbell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Netbook Recommendations with Window-Eyes

Janet,

Stay away from the Dell as the memory on that is not upgradeable as of last
August. When we bought our Asus netbooks.  Also with the Dell, the function
key  does not behave as expected.

I'm running XP on my netbook as it was recommended at the time that one not
get Windows 7 on a netbook.  Keep in mind that this was prior to Windows 7
coming out.

We run 2 gb of RAM in our netbooks, having had that upgraded at the time of
purchase.

HTH.

Karyn Campbell, Illinois USA, [email protected]
Using WE 7.2 on Toshiba laptop running Vista home premium SP 1 32 bit with
Office 2007 and IE 7 along with Asus netbook running XP home 32 bit with
Office 2007 and IE 7 with AVG 8.5 free on both machines.
Check out my blog at packerbackerkaryn.blogspot.com
Follow me on twitter at www.twitter.com/packerbackerkar




If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.




        WARNING!!!

This email could contain innocent phrases which, if taken out of context, or read from an existing inclination to be hostile, or an overly politically correct world view could induce cursing, abusive language, or other indications of less than desirable behavior in a public venue.
No ill will is intended.
The sender takes no responsibility for mis-interpretation or otherwise extrapolated extended meaning, intent, or purposes implied or imagined from said phrases. The receiver of any such email containing such phrases is solely responsible for good interpretation and intelligent deployment of subsequent responses to the above communication.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to