Same here regarding Windows 8. I am using Windows 7 until this laptop dies then it's all Apple and use Windows on my mac.

Regards Chris

On 10/02/2014 22:40, Sky Mundell wrote:
Hi, I think sooner or later Window-Eyes could be merged into Windows. Ihave 
even trialed my dads windows 8 laptop, and I have to say I’m not really that 
impressed with windows 8.1. I’ve even looked at Narrator in Windows 8.1 and 
while narrator has improved  a bit, if you press the down arrow in web pages, 
it doesn’t read. If you press the down arrow, up arrow in notepad, etc, 
narrator just does not read. This is why its very important to have a fully 
function reader such as Window-Eyes in my opinion.



From: Brendon Donohue [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 2:01 PM
To: 'Chris'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Functionality of the Ms Office version of Window-eyes
Importance: High



Chris,



This makes perfect sense. I personally think that the office deal is just a 
trial run and Window eyes is going to be merged into Windows soon. Let’s face 
it, MS has never been good at making screen readers up until now, so wouldn’t 
be great to let someone else do it, and just pay them a little bit of money and 
I think it will be window eyes and GW. I know nothing, but this makes sense.



Thank you.



Brendon Donohue.



From: Chris [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, 9 February 2014 2:35 AM
To: Michael Massey; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Functionality of the Ms Office version of Window-eyes



The thing that really gets me about this is that, beyond how easy it is to find 
the true information in multiple places on the web, it just doesn’t make sense. 
I mean, think about it. Hmmm, I think it would be a great idea if we were to 
provide a free screen reader for Office, but I think we will make it only work 
in Office and nowhere else, thus making it difficult or impossible for users to 
get Windows going and Office up and running since there is no speech outside of 
Office. This makes perfect sense. So, then the next round of misinformation is 
that it will work outside of Office, but only to navigate around Windows 
functions. This also makes so much sense. GW Micro would have to actually put 
development time and effort into alterations to the free version to lock out 
functionality in other applications. They would have to use up time and money 
to make a purposeful effort to lock the screen reader into such limited 
functionality. This concept just makes so much sense. I mean
, just use a little bit of logic. The partnership with MS includes income for 
GW Micro so that they can continue to make a good enough profit on the free 
version to stay in business and keep up development. I would not be surprised 
if the deal actually is one that will increase their development resources. It 
would be completely counterproductive to waste resources on creating a locked 
down free version. All that is not included is services and extras that are not 
required to make full use of the screen reader and purchasing those extras 
still will leave users who want them far ahead of the full retail price.

Regards,



Chris



From: Michael Massey <mailto:[email protected]>

Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 9:10 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Functionality of the Ms Office version of Window-eyes



Well, now whoever spread this misinformation about Window-eyes only functioning 
with Ms Office needs to relisten to and reread the information that Gw Micro 
released clearly explaining the partnership with Microsoft and the inclusion of 
a fully functional version of Window-eyes.  This misinformation is what I 
consider to be an indirect slap in the face to Gw Micro.  Do those who spread 
this misinformation really believe that if Gw Micro so highly promoted the 
partnership would release a version of Window-eyes only to fully function with 
Ms Office?  No way.  Louis, I know you’re smart enough not to stick your foot 
in your mouth in this situation, and besides, I don’t think a dirty foot would 
taste too good, smile. I could write a lot more, but much of what I feel like 
writing could get me removed from this list, smile.



Mike M.


If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to