Tom: I have not seen you on any professional lists I frequent and have always tried to conduct myself in a professional manner on every list I have been on and believe I have a solid reputation to that effect. If you think my posts are not professional, you have never mentioned it on this or any other professional list over the past decade or so. I won't tell you all the professional lists I am on but I believe your opinion of me is not worth replying to any further. It hurts my feelings that you say such a thing after years, and years, of trying to maintain only a high level of professionalism.
But, I will take it for what it's worth and try to do better going forward.
Thank you for your reply.
Rick USA
----- Original Message -----

From: "Tom Kingston" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: WindowEyes.dll and Scripting.dll


The snitty tone of this list? You should take a good look at your own posts, Rick. I've never seen such inconsiderate posts bashing Window-Eyes, the GW staff, and insulting everyone who doesn't use your all mighty automated, rush to market, do the work for you, bloatware generating, grossly inefficient, security risk riddled .net Framework IDE. You even blamed your vicious post of yesterday on Window-Eyes. Strange, no one else on the planet has experienced such a problem that could be directly related to Window-Eyes. I've never seen a so-called programmer so adamantly averse to writing code. But then again, I'm from the old school when every line of code mattered and efficiency and stability was the number one priority. I realize those are things of the past for most, but contrary to popular belief, not everyone.

This is why we need super computers to run all the one size fits all auto-generated resource hog programs which pervade the market today. If programmers got back to programming, that in-and-of itself would double the speed of our processors.

This isn't intended as a swing at you, Rick, just an honest reality check. I didn't want to use VBScript initially either, but it didn't take brain surgery to figure out just how powerful the Window-Eyes object model is and how much work GW did for us up front to take advantage of that power as quick and easily as possible. And finally, it is undisputable that their support is second to none in the industry. But we're all only human, and there are very few who wouldn't have written you off long ago in light of your attitude. perhaps some soul searching is in order. Just a suggestion.

Regards,
Tom

----- Original Message ----- From: "RicksPlace" <[email protected]>


Hi Ron: You are a professional and it should matter to you whether you are a PR person or not. I don't like the snitty tone of this list which has developed over the last year or so. The technicals have been more and more replaced with personal, not so subtle, digs at folks who ask questions. There could be many reasons for it and I fully understand most of them. I will stop posting for awhile to clear the personal cobwebs I get from many of the posts and I would guess you guys at GW won't miss me very much. I will try and only jump in if there is some technical I can help with or someone mdirects a question to me.
Rick USA



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4253 (20090717) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com






Reply via email to