For what it's worth, I received Ron's post after both yours and
Aaron's here as well, meaning it actually arrived after them.
Probably just a fluke, but I've seen it numerous times on various
lists before.

On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:02:12AM -0400, RicksPlace wrote:
   Hi Aaron, I went through my morning postings and the ones from
   yesterday related to my project. I saw 3 or 4 posts in a group, one of
   which was Ron's post you were likely referring to. These posts were
   earlier than the thread I was referring to and I have no clue why I
   didn't see them last night. Either they wern't showing up or I just
   missed them which is not very likely but I have to say they are there,
   in their proper date / time place, this morning.

   Anyway, I can see the exact work-around you are refering to and, yes, I
   did not see that post last night for whatever reason so your question
   was certainly valid.

   Man, I can't believe I simply missed reading a handful of posts unless
   they just wern't showing up when I looked at the list prior to putting
   up my final post last night.

   I would not have pushed it to try and do those tests, document the
   outputs and all that jazz had I seen that particular post and I very
   seldom miss reading relevant posts but it is what it is so my bad I
   guess and I paid for it by a couple of hours of grinding testing when
   it wasn't necessary.

   Off to take some orange juice and try Ron's suggested work-around.

   Later:

   Rick USA

-- 
Doug Lee, Senior Accessibility Programmer
SSB BART Group - Accessibility-on-Demand
mailto:doug....@ssbbartgroup.com  http://www.ssbbartgroup.com
"While they were saying among themselves it cannot be done,
it was done." --Helen Keller

Reply via email to